فارسی
آقابابایی، حسین و رمضانی، مهران (1403). چالشهای اجرای اصل قضامندی: از ترجیحات شخصی دادرسان تا ناکارامدی نهاد دادرسی. دوفصلنامه تحقیق و توسعه در حقوق کیفری و جرم شناسی، 1(2)، 8-33. Doi: 10.22034/jclc.2025.2049722.1140
اسماعیلی، محسن، حبیبنژاد، سید احمد و داودی، حدیثه (1403). آسیبشناسی دادرسی رسانهای در نظام حقوقی ایران با نگاهی به مطالعات تطبیقی. فصلنامه تحقیق و توسعه در حقوق تطبیقی. 7(25)، 7-45. Doi: 10.22034/law.2024.2036740.1425
فروزنده، پیام (1403). جبران زیان معنوی ناشی از جرم، در کتاب حقوق مسئولیت مدنی؛ توجیه و نقد رویه قضایی زیرنظر عباس میرشکاری. مرکز مطبوعات و انتشارات قوه قضاییه، صص. 137–150.
میرشکاری، عباس (1393). نقد یک رای، در زمینه مطالبه زیان ناشی از تأخیر در پرواز. فصلنامه قضاوت، 14(79)، صص 121–133.
میرشکاری، عباس و ارضی, محمد (1400). تحلیل دو رأی درباره زیان معنوی ناشی از نقض تعهدات قراردادی. فصلنامه تحقیق و توسعه در حقوق تطبیقی، 4(10)، صص. 160-186. Doi: 10.22034/law.2021.527473.1066
نیکخوی مردملک، پویان و میرشکاری, عباس. (1404). بازاندیشی در احراز رابطۀ سببیت با توجه به سوگیریهای شناختی قضات. مجله حقوقی دادگستری.
دادنامه شماره 141 به تاریخ 1393/10/27 صادره از شعبه 5 دادگاه عمومی حقوقی شهریار.
دادنامه شماره 9509970220300400 به تاریخ ۲۹/۳/۱۳۹۵ صادره از شعبه 3 دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان تهران.
دادنامه شماره ۲۰۰۶۲۹، ۲۵/۸/۱۳۹۴، صادره از دادگاه بخش لاران.
دادنامه شماره ۱۵۷۰۲۱۶، ۲۷/۱۰/۱۴۰۰ صادره از شعبه ۱۰۲۹ از دادگاه کیفری دو تهران.
دادنامه شماره ۲۷۶۳۳۷۰ به تاریخ ۰۲/۰۳/۱۴۰۱ صادره از شعبه ۴۶ از دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان تهران.
دادنامه شماره ۸۸۰/۶۱۷ به تاریخ ۱۴/۱/۱۳۸۸ صادره از شعبه ۲۰۶ دادگاه عمومی تهران.
دادنامه شماره 8801091 صادره از شعبۀ 1 دادگاه عمومی حقوقی تهران.
دادنامه شماره ۸۸۰/۶۱۷ صادره از شعبه ۲۰۶ دادگاه عمومی تهران.
دادنامه شماره 9909984146600044 صادره از شعبه دیوان عالی کشور.
دادنامه شماره 9109970902903407 صادره از شعبه 29 دیوان عدالت اداری.
English
Arce, R., Fariña, F., and Novo, M. (2003). Anchoring in judicial decision-making. Psychology in Spain, 7(1), 56–65.
Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., and Prelec, D. (2003). “Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 73–106. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535153
Bahník, Š., Englich, B., and Strack, F. (Eds.). (2016). Anchoring Effect. In Cognitive Illusions (pp. 223–241). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315696935-16
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bargh, J. A., and Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis and C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). Cambridge University Press.
Beggs, A., and Graddy, K. (2009). Anchoring Effects: Evidence from Art Auctions. American Economic Review, 99(3), 1027–1039. https://doi.org/10.1257/AER.99.3.1027
Bornstein, B. H. ., and Greene, E. (2017). The jury under fire : myth, controversy, and reform. Oxford University Press.
Bornstein, B. H. ., and Miller, M. K. . (2019). Advances in psychology and law (Vol. 4). Springer.
Bornstein, B. H., Wiener, R. L., Schopp, R. F., and Willborn, S. L. (2008). Civil juries and civil justice: Psychological and legal perspectives. In B. H. Bornstein, R. L. Wiener, R. F. Schopp, and S. L. Willborn (Eds.), Civil Juries and Civil Justice: Psychological and Legal Perspectives. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74490-2
Brand, C. (2016). Dual-Process Theories in Moral Psychology. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Broeder, D. (1959). The University of Chicago Jury Project. Nebraska Law Review, 38(3), 744–760.
Bystranowski, P., Janik, B., Próchnicki, M., and Skórska, P. (2021). Anchoring effect in legal decision-making: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 45(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/LHB0000438
Carson, D., and Bull, R. (2003). Handbook of psychology in legal contexts. J. Wiley.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
Chang, Y., Chen, K.-P., and Lin, C. (2016). Anchoring Effect in Real Litigation: An Empirical Study. University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics, 744, 1–71. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2726903
Chapman, G. B., and Bornstein, B. H. (1996). The more you ask for, the more you get: Anchoring in personal injury verdicts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(6), 519–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199612)10:6%3C519::AID-ACP417%3E3.0.CO;2-5
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R., and Ross, L. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. The Philosophical Review, 92(3), 462. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184495
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., and Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Costanzo, M., and Krauss, D. (2012). Forensic and Legal Psychology: Psychological Science Applied to Law. BFW Publishers.
Devine, D. J. . (2012). Jury decision making : the state of the science. New York University Press.
Diamond, S., Saks, M., and Landsman, S. (1998). Juror Judgments about Liability and Damages: Sources of Viriability and Ways to Increase Consistency. DePaul Law Review, 48(2), 301–327.
Einhorn, H. J., and Hogarth, R. M. (1985). Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Probabilistic Inference. Psychological Review, 92(4), 433–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.433
Englich, B., and Mussweiler, T. (2001). Sentencing under uncertainty: Anchoring effects in the courtroom. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(7), 1535–1551. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1559-1816.2001.TB02687.X
Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F. (2005). The last word in court - A hidden disadvantage for the defense. Law and Human Behavior, 29(6), 705–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10979-005-8380-7
Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F. (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: the influence of irrelevant anchors on experts’ judicial decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205282152
Entman, R. M., and Rojecki, A. (2001). The Black Image in the White Mind: Media and Race in America (Studies in Communication, Media, and Public Opinion). University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/B/bo4488399.html
Ericsson, K. A., and Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211
Feldman, Y., Schurr, A., and Teichman, D. (2016). Anchoring Legal Standards. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 13(2), 298–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/JELS.12116
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Findley, J. D. ., and Sales, B. D. (2012). The Science of Attorney Advocacy: How Courtroom Behavior Affects Jury Decision Making. American Psychological Association.
Fitzmaurice, C., and Pease, K. (1986). Psychology of Judicial Sentencing. Manchester University Press.
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
Galinsky, A. D., and Mussweiler, T. (2001). First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.657
Gawronski, B., Luke, D. M., and Creighton, L. A. (2024). Dual-process theories. In D. E. Carlston, K. Hugenberg, and K. L. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition (2nd ed., pp. 319–353). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780197763414.013.12
Gigerenzer, G., and Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650–669. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.650
Greene, E., and Bornstein, B. H. . (2003). Determining damages : the psychology of jury awards. American Psychological Association.
Greene, E., Downey, C., and Goodman-Delahunty, J. (1999). Juror decisions about damages in employment discrimination cases. Behavioral Scien-Ces and the Law, 17(1), 107–121.
Greene, E., Hayman, K., and Motyl, M. (2008). “SHOULDN’T WE CONSIDER...?”: Jury Discussions of Forbidden Topics and Effects on Damage Awards. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14(3), 194–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0013486
Greene, E., Heilbrun, K., Fortune, W. H., and Nietzel, M. T. (2006). Wrightsman’s psychology and the legal system. Thomson/ Wadsworth.
Greenspan, R., and Scurich, N. (2016). The interdependence of perceived confession voluntariness and case evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 650–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/LHB0000200
Guthrie, C., and Orr, D. (2004). Anchoring, Information, Expertise, and Negotiation: New Insights from Meta-Analysis. Yale Law Journal, 113(7), 1579–1621. https://doi.org/10.2307/4135774
Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J., and Wistrich, A. (2001). Inside the Judicial Mind. Cornell Law Faculty Publications, 778–829.
Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J., and Wistrich, A. (2007). Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases. Cornell Law Faculty Publications, 2–44.
Hastie, R. (2011). The Challenge to Produce Useful “Legal Numbers.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1740-1461.2011.01224.X
Hastie, R., Schkade, D. A., and Payne, J. W. (1999). Juror judgments in civil cases: Effects of plaintiff’s requests and plaintiff’s identity on punitive damage awards. Law and Human Behavior, 23(4), 445–470. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022312115561
Haydock, R. S. ., and Sonsteng, J. O. . (1991). Trial : theories, tactics, techniques. West Pub. Co.
Helm, R., Hans, V., and Reyna, V. (2017). Trial by Numbers. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 27(1), 108–142.
Hinsz, V. B., and Indahl, K. E. (1995). Assimilation to Anchors for Damage Awards in a Mock Civil Trial. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(11), 991–1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1559-1816.1995.TB02386.X
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos. Houghton Mifflin.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Kagehiro, D. ., and Laufer, W. S. . (1992). Handbook of psychology and law. Springer-Verlag.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215
Klein, D. E. ., and Mitchell, G. (2010). The psychology of judicial decision making. Oxford University Press.
Koppen, P. J. Van, and Penrod, S. D. (2003). Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Justice: Psychological Perspectives on Criminal Justice Systems (P. J. Van Koppen and S. D. Penrod (Eds.); Vol. 17). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9196-6
Kornhauser, L. (1989). An Ecomomic Perspective on Stare Decisis. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 65(1), 63–92.
Kovera, M. B. (2002). The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: An examination of moderators and mediating mechanisms. Law and Human Behavior, 26(1), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013829224920
Landsman, S., Diamond, S., Dimitropoulos, L., and Saks, M. (1998). Be Careful What You Wish For: The Paradoxical Effects of Bifurcating Claims for Punitive Damages. Wisconsin Law Review, 1, 297–342.
Leyens, J. ‐P. (1989). Another look at confirmatory strategies during a real interview. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19(3), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/EJSP.2420190307
Lind, E. A. (Ed.). (2020). Social psychology and justice. Routledge.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., and Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109.
McAuliff, B. D., and Bornstein, B. H. (2010). All anchors are not created equal: The effects of per diem versus lump sum requests on pain and suffering awards. Law and Human Behavior, 34(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10979-009-9178-8
Murdock, B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1037/H0045106
Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison Processes in Social Judgment: Mechanisms and Consequences. Psychological Review, 110(3), 472–489. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.472
Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F. (1999a). Comparing is believing: A selective accessibility model of judgmental anchoring. In W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (135–167). Wiley.
Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F. (1999b). Hypothesis-Consistent Testing and Semantic Priming in the Anchoring Paradigm: A Selective Accessibility Model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(2), 136–164. https://doi.org/10.1006/JESP.1998.1364
Neale, M. A., and Bazerman, M. H. (1992). Negotiator cognition and rationality: A behavioral decision theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90009-V
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
Northcraft, G. B., and Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(87)90046-X
Otto, A. L., Penrod, S. D., and Dexter, H. R. (1994). The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 18(4), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499050
Perkins, D. N. (1989). Reasoning as it is and could be: An empirical perspective. In D. M. Topping, D. C. Crowell, and V. N. Kobayashi (Eds.), Thinking across cultures: The Third International Conference on Thinking (pp. 175–194). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Perlman, P. (1994). Opening Statements. ATLA Press.
Perry, S. R. (1987). Judicial obligation, precedent and the common law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7(2), 215–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/OJLS/7.2.215
Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. In Communication and Persuasion. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1
Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
Pyszczynski, T., and Greenberg, J. (1987). Self-Regulatory Perseveration and the Depressive Self-Focusing Style: A Self-Awareness Theory of Reactive Depression. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.122
Rabin, M., and Schrag, J. L. (1999). First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory Bias. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 37–82. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399555945
Rachlinski, J., Wistrich, A., and Guthrie, C. (2013). Altering Attention in Adjudication. Cornell Law Faculty Publications, 60(6), 1588–1618.
Raitt, F. E. ., and Zeedyk, M. S. (2011). The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law. Taylor and Francis Group.
Raitz, A., Greene, E., Goodman, J., and Loftus, E. F. (1990). Determining damages - The influence of expert testimony on jurors’ decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 14(4), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068163/METRICS
Rassin, E. (2023). Case Studies in Legal Psychology: Psychological Perspectives on Criminal Evidence. Springer.
Redondo, S., Genovés, V. G., Pérez, J., and Barberet, R. (2011). Advances in psychology and law: International contributions. In Advances in Psychology and Law: International Contributions. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110801163
Robbennolt, J. K. ., and Hans, V. P. . (2017). The psychology of tort law. New York University Press.
Saks, M. J. ., and Spellman, B. A. . (2016). The psychological foundations of evidence law. New York University Press.
Saks, M. J., Holinger, L. A., Wissler, L., Evans, L., and Hart, A. J. (1997). Reducing variability in civil jury awards. Law and Human Behavior, 21(3), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834614312
Sales, B. D., and Krauss, D. A. . (2015). The psychology of law: human behavior, legal institutions, and law. American Psychological Association.
Schneider, D. J. ., Hastorf, A. H. ., and Ellsworth, P. (1979). Person perception. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man; social and rational. Wiley.
Simon, L., Greenberg, J., and Brehm, J. (1995). Trivialization: The Forgotten Mode of Dissonance Reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.247
Stein, A., and Allen, R. (2013). Evidence, Probability, and the Burden of Proof. Faculty Scholarship, 55(3), 558–603.
Stein, C., and Drouin, M. (2017). Cognitive Bias in the Courtroom: Combating the Anchoring Effect in Criminal Sentencing. SSRN, 1–39.
Studebaker, C. A., and Penrod, S. D. (1997). Pretrial Publicity: The Media, the Law, and Common Sense. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3(2–3), 428–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.428
Sugarman, S. D. (2013). Tort Damages for Non-economic Losses (in cases of physical injury to the person). In M. Bussani and A. J. Sebok (Eds.), Comparative Tort Law: Global Perspectives (pp. 201–256). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Misfearing: A Reply. Harvard Law Review, 119(274), 1–23.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.185.4157.1124
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.7455683
Wistrich, A., Guthrie, C., and Rachlinski, J. (2005). Can Judges Ignore Inadmissible Information? The Difficulty of Deliberately Disregarding. Cornell Law Faculty Publications, 153, 1251–1345.
Wrightsman, L. S. (1999). Judicial Decision Making: Is Psychology Relevant? In Judicial Decision Making. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4807-2
Zuckerman, A. A. S. . (2021). Zuckerman on civil procedure : principles of practice. Sweet and Maxwell/Thomson Reuters.
