Research and development in private law

Research and development in private law

Foundations of Property Rights in the Digital Age

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Associate Professor at University of Tehran
2 Graduate with a Master's degree in Private Law from the University of Tehran
Abstract
The right to property can be regarded as the most popular yet the most challenging financial right of human beings. This challenge has been amplified with the digitalization of our legal and social life, such that the digital age alongside introducing fundamental changes in the legal framework of various institutions has not left the right to property immune from transformation. One of the fundamental challenges concerning property rights in the digital era lies in determining whether public policy in the digital environment should be based on the expansion or the restriction of ownership rights. On the one hand, one may argue that, given the emergence of new forms of property known as digital assets and the fact that property rights in this environment are far more vulnerable to infringement compared to the physical sphere, legislative policies should provide stronger protection for the holders of such rights. On the other hand, this approach may be criticized on the grounds that the very philosophy of the digital environment lies in its ease of use and accessibility to a wide range of individuals; thus, extending exclusive ownership rights to digital assets may undermine this foundational principle. Since this issue has not been thoroughly examined in Iranian law, the present article seeks to fill this gap by addressing the following question: What is the most appropriate policy regarding property rights in the digital age? The working hypothesis of this study is that an optimal policy should adopt a balanced approach by recognizing property rights while simultaneously imposing limitations and exceptions in favor of users—a matter that has not been adequately reflected in certain Iranian laws. This research employs a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach, relying on library sources, and is presented in two main sections: the first section explores the concept of property rights in the digital sphere, digital assets, and the comparative legal context of Iran and other jurisdictions; the second section discusses the proper legal policies regarding property rights in the digital era, considering the specific characteristics of the digital environment. Finally, the article offers clear and practical recommendations for stakeholders, particularly legislators and policymakers.
Keywords
Subjects

  1. Aghaei, M. (2020). Personal data as property: A legal approach in the digital age. Judiciary Research Institute Press. (in Persian)
  2. Emami, S. H. (1993). Civil law (Vol. 1). Eslamiyeh Publications. (in Persian)
  3. Eshraghi arani, M., & Ghorbannia, A. M. (2025). Feasibility of enforcement of restitution order regarding virtual currencies, a comparative study of Iranian and American law. Journal of Research and Development in Private Law. DOI: 10.22034/jpl.2025.721252 (in Persian)
  4. Jafari-Langeroudi, M. J. (2009). Terminology of law. Ganj-e Danesh. (in Persian)
  5. Jafari-Langeroudi, M. J. (2016). Terminology of law. Ganj-e Danesh. (in Persian)
  6. Habiba, S., & Nabavi, M. (2025). Protection of Intellectual Property Rights of Big Data. Journal of Research and Development in Public Law. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/jrpl.2025.721657 (in Persian)
  7. Hosseini, M. (2020). Intellectual property rights in the context of emerging technologies. Mizan Publishing. (in Persian)
  8. Khalili, M. (2021). Digital ownership law and emerging challenges. Mizan Publishing. (in Persian)
  9. Khalili, M. R. (2022). A comparative study of digital property and ownership in Iranian and French law. Journal of Technology Law Studies, 28–49. (in Persian)
  10. Dehghani, A. M. (2020). Legal challenges of data ownership in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Private Law Studies, 75–98. (in Persian)
  11. Rahimi, S. (2021). Intellectual property rights in cyberspace. Information Technology Law Quarterly, 2, 55–80. (in Persian)
  12. Zare, M. R. (2021). Validity of smart contracts in the Iranian legal system. Private Law Research Quarterly, 85–108. (in Persian)
  13. Safari, H. R. (2022). Ownership in the Metaverse: Challenges and opportunities. Modern Legal Research Journal, 105–125. (in Persian)
  14. Sharifi, E. (2022). Data law and ownership in the digital age. Allameh Tabataba’i University Press. (in Persian)
  15. Sharifi, M. (2022). Cryptocurrency ownership and its legal challenges. Modern Legal Research Quarterly, 41–89. (in Persian)
  16. Mousavi, R. (2022). A comparative study of the legal system of digital ownership in Iran and the European Union. Comparative Law Research Journal, 120–145. (in Persian)
  17. Mousavi, S. (2021). A comparative study of Iran’s e-commerce law and international regulations. Research Institute for Culture and Islamic Thought. (in Persian)
  18. Mousavi, F. (2023). Jurisprudential and legal analysis of ownership of crypto-assets. Journal of Jurisprudence and New Technology Law, 43–62. (in Persian)
  19. Katouzian, N. (2011). Civil law: Persons and property (21st ed.). Joint Stock Publishing Company. (in Persian)
  20. Katouzian, N. (2012). Civil law: Persons and property. Joint Stock Publishing Company. (in Persian)

21.  Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press.

22.  Beale, H. G. (Ed.). (2019). Chitty on Contracts (33rd ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.

23.  Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press.

24.  De Filippi, P., & Wright, A. (2022). Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press.

25.  Desai, D. R., & Riedl, M. (2024). Between copyright and computer science: The law and ethics of generative AI. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14653

26.  DLA Piper. (2022). Exploring the metaverse: What laws will apply? DLA Piper Insights. https://www.dlapiper.com/enOM/insights/publications/2022/02/exploring-the-metaverse

27.  Eisenmann, T. (2013). Platform Markets and Two-Sided Network Effects. Management Science, 59(1), 24–39.

28.  European Commission. (2020). Consumer Protection in the Digital Age.

29.  Fairfield, J. A. T. (2015). Virtual Property. Boston University Law Review, 85, 1047–1102.

30.  Fisher, E. (2023). Law, Technology and the Digital Constitution. Oxford University Press.

31.  Floridi, L. (2022). The Ethics of the Digital. Oxford University Press.

32.  Gautam, M. (2022). Ownership in the Metaverse: Legal Reality of Virtual Property Rights. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 36(1), 101–130.

33.  Harvard Law Review. (2021). Digital Assets: The Case for Legal Protection.

34.  Kowalski, M., & Nowak, A. (2023). The Transformation of Legal Knowledge in the Age of Digital Reason. Law and Philosophy, 42(3), 451–475.

35.  Linyi, X., & Li, Z. (2025). Enhancing systematic interoperability: Convergences and mismatches between Web 3.0 and the EU Data Act. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07356

36.  MIT Press. Capitalism.

37.  Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.

38.  OECD. (2019). The Importance of Intellectual Property Protection in Digital Markets.

39.  Purtova, N. (2021). Data as the New Source of Power: Property, Control, and Regulation. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 23(2), 301–356.

40.  Riabchenko, A., & Onyshchenko, O. (2025). Digital Sovereignty and Transnational Legal Order. European Review of Private Law, 33(1), 87–110.

41.  Rosen, M. (2021). NFTs and Copyright: Who Really Owns What in the Metaverse? Stanford Technology Law Review, 24(2), 151–179.

42.  Samuelson, P., & Scotchmer, S. (2002). The Law and Economics of Intellectual Property in the Digital Age. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(2), 157–182.

43.  Schwab, K., & Malleret, T. (2021). The Great Reset. World Economic Forum.

44.  Sims, A. (2023). Jurisdiction and Legal Risks in the Metaverse. Journal of Digital Law & Policy, 9(2), 65–89.

45.  Sprankling, J. G. (2014). Understanding Property Law (3rd ed.). Carolina Academic Press.

46.  Walch, A. (2023). Algorithmic Authority and the Future of Legal Trust. Stanford Technology Law Review, 26(2), 215–260.

47.  WIPO. (2019). Intellectual Property and Innovation in the Digital Age.

48.  WIPO. (2021). The Impact of Blockchain on Intellectual Property.

49.  World Bank. (2018). Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Development.

50.  Wyczik, J. (2024). Ownership in the 21st century: Property law of digital assets. Information & Communications Technology Law, 33(2), 145–167.

51.  Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.