Research and development in private law

Research and development in private law

Deficiency in the completeness of appellate parties

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Faculty of Law and Political Science, Kharazmi University
2 faculty of law and political science, Kharazmi University
3 Faculty of law and political science, Tehran University
Abstract
IIn the current some courts procedure, the guarantee of not mentioning all the first litigants in the appeal petition is to reject the lawsuit, and it does not matter whether the first verdict is decomposable or not; It is necessary to distinguish between decomposable and indecomposable votes. The executive guarantee that the appeals court imposes on this defect of the petition in terms of the lack of all the convicts is not proportional to the defect of the petition, because the re-initiation of the lawsuit is closed in order to finalize the decision on the merits. Also, if the first lawsuit has two defendants, one of whom has been convicted and the other has been dismissed, that is, there is a plurality of defendants and not a plurality of defendants. have Because the protest must be made by the defendant against the defendant, the proceedings of the Supreme Court face difficulties. In the Supreme Courts No.831 Unification of Judgments Decision, the possibility of a third objection was foreseen for the party to the first lawsuit who was not included in the party's appeal, but such a provision does not completely remove the obstacles to the proceedings at the appeal stage. This article, in a descriptive-analytical way and with library sources, while showing the shortcomings of the legislation, has also provided solutions to fix it according to judicial opinions and comparative law. The important findings are that the Iranian legislature does not have a specific provision in the above cases, but opinions have been issued that show the necessity of filing a protest against all parties to the original lawsuit. Issuing a notice to correct the defect, attracting a third party and even the court's authority to attract interested parties, such as the civil procedure of France and some other countries such as the United States, England, and Australia, are considered to be a guarantee of more appropriate executions.
Keywords
Subjects

• Ahmadi, Khalil (2014), ((An Indivisible Effect and Separation in Different Stages of Complaint)), Legal Research Quarterly, No. 69,(in persian)
• Cadiet, Loïc (2011), Towards a “General Theory of the Trial” Ritsumeikan Law Review, No. 28,( in french)
• Cappelletti, Moro and Brian J. Garth (2019), Civil Procedure Code, Volume One, Translated and Researched by Hassan Mohseni, Tehran: Publications of the Joint Stock Company,(in persian)
• Dworkin, Ronald(1985) , A Matter of Principle, Harvard University Press,
• Elsan, Mostafa and Nasibeh Mahmoudi (2018), ((A Comparative Study of the Principle of Immutability of Legal Litigation in Iranian and American Law)), Comparative Law Studies, Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 473 to 491,(in persian) ,(in persian)
• Farahzadi, Ali Akbar and Seyyed Rasoul Mirnejad (1400), ((Principle of Restoration of Proceedings in Civil Procedure Law)), Justice Legal Journal, Volume 85, Number 116. ,(in persian)
• Fathi, Badi and Hormozi, Khairollah. (1402). Indivisible Claims in Civil Procedure of Iran and France. Justice Legal Journal, 87(122), 317-350. doi: 10.22106/jlj.2023.559636.4943,(in persian)
• Fathi, Badi. (1402). Abolition of the Right to Complaint against a Decision; Criticism of the Decision of the Supreme Court on the Unity of Procedure No. 819 (16/01/1401). Two Quarterly Journals of Criticism and Analysis of Judicial Decisions, 2(4), 339-360. doi: 10.22034/analysis.2023.2009293.1070. ,
• Garner, Bryan A,(2009) Black's Law Dictionary® Ninth Edition. Editor in Chief,west, A Thomson Reuters business
• Ghahremani, Nasrallah (2015), ((Rule and Exception in the Law of Civil Procedure)), Journal of the Iranian Bar Association, ,(in persian)
• Hosseini, Seyed Mohammad Reza (2001), Civil Procedure in Judicial Procedure, Tehran: Majd
• Iftikhar Jahromi, Goodarz and Mostafa Elsan (2019), Civil Procedure, Volume One, Tehran: Mizan Publishing,(in persian)
• Katouzian, Naser (2006), Proof and evidence of Proof, Volume Two, Fourth Edition, Tehran: Publications of Mizan,(in persian)
• Khodabakhshi, Abdullah (2015), Law of Claims: General Rules of Claims, First Edition, Tehran: Publishing Joint Stock Company,(in persian)
• Kiaei, Shahab. (2002). Dispute; Subject of Civil Procedure Review and Criticism of the Verdict of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Iran No. 719 (20/02/2011). Bi-Quarterly Journal of Criticism and Analysis of Judicial Decisions, 2(4), 541-562. doi: 10.22034/analysis.2023.2006586.1024,(in persian)
• Matin Daftari, Ahmad (2015), Civil and Commercial Procedure Code, Tehran: Majd,(in persian)
• Matin Daftari, Ahmad (unpublished), Collection of Judicial Procedures, Legal Section from 1931 to 1976, Hashemi Printing House,(in persian)
• Mohajeri, Ali (2018), New Comprehensive Course in Civil Procedure, Volume 3, First Edition, Tehran: Fekr Sazan. ,(in persian)
• Mohseni, Hassan (2014) French Civil Procedure Code with a Preface and Introduction by Dr. Abbas Karimi and Professor Louis Cadier, Third Edition, Tehran: Publishing Joint Stock Company,(in persian)
• Mohseni, Hassan (2014), Formal and Substantive Defects in Civil Procedure, Private Law Research, Volume 2, Issue 6. ,(in persian)
• Mohseni, Hassan. (2018). The Concept and Procedure of Indivisible and Indivisible Litigation and Judgment. Scientific Journal of "Private Law", 15(2), 219-239. doi: 10.22059/jolt.2019.256325.1006555,(in persian)
• Nahrini, Fereydoun (1400), Civil Procedure Code, Volume 3, Second Edition, Tehran: Ganj Danesh Publications,(in persian)
• Shams, Abdullah (2011), Advanced Civil Procedure, Volume 1, Issue 28, Tehran: Drak,(in persian)
• Shams, Abdullah (2012), Advanced Civil Procedure, Volume 2, Issue 31, Tehran: Drak,(in persian)
• Shams, Abdullah (2019), Execution of Civil Judgments, Volume 1, Third Edition, Tehran: Drak Publications,(in persian)
• Tahmasebi, Ali. (2017). Analysis of Civil Procedure Rules Assuming Multiple Litigation Parties. Justice Legal Journal, 81(98), 125-146. doi: 10.22106/jlj.2017.26777,(in persian)